Oh NICE!
I definitely could not find this pool on my first pass on honeyswap analytics.
In effect Giveth and DappNode would swap 50k DAI worth of their tokens (GIV, NODE respectively). Giveth has a large sum of GIV earmarked for LP opportunities so we would take another 50k of GIV from our Liquidity Multisig to make a 100k NODE/GIV LP which would be held by the same Giveth owned multisig. DappNode has total liberty to do as they wish with their GIV tokens, stake them in the GIVfarm, participate in the GIVgarden; however ideally DappNode would follow suit and create their own GIV/NODE LP held by their own DAO create an even stronger bridge.
I’m in favour of DAO’s holding their own LP positions rather than creating sub-DAOs because
a. It reduces the admin overheard of managing a sub-DAO for every partnership made.
b. Neither party is directly beholden to the other to manage their portion of an LP position, a DAO has sovereignty over its liquidity. Social reputation is the main mechanism for each DAO to maintain or modify its LP positions.